Create, Consult, Control
News & commentary on intellectual property issues.
Jul152010 | Steve O'Donnell
Does downloading really hurt DVD sales?
The movie industry often blames flat or decreased DVD sales figures on file sharing, but are those that download the same group that would have otherwise bought a disc?
I don't know the answer, and I don't have any data to support a position, I was just thinking about this the other night and would like some feedback.
On the one hand it makes sense that at least some people wouldn't buy something they could get for free (even if that meant infringing a copyright and running the risk of getting caught). On the other hand, if movies suddenly weren't available through file sharing avenues anymore, how many people would move to Netflix or similar, and how many would start buying discs?
There are four options (maybe more): downloading, borrowing, renting, and buying. If downloading is removed, and you don't have a friend that already owns a movie, then the next cheapest option is to rent it. Buying is still quite a bit more expensive than renting.
I suspect that the businesses getting hit hardest by movie downloading are rental places, and since rental places don't seem to be complaining about their bottom-line, maybe movie downloading isn't hurting film makers.
I'm only talking about downloading movies out on disc. Movies still in theaters and other types of media all have their own issues.
What are you thoughts?
Recent Posts
- Cheesy Poofs
- Does a twitter follow have a value? What does this mean for RT contests?
- XXX Domains. Should you care?
- Steve Jobs, 1955-2011
- Who doesn’t like free porn?
- My ex-employee is using my customer list and materials!
- Can I get sued for this?
- A painless trademark dispute
- DC vs Batmobile custom car seller
- The Days of Turkey Roll



Comments
For example, my wife and I have a Netflix account, and we stream content from Netflix to our TiVo. We've got a queue of probably 30 movies ready to be watched. I put a lot of those movies on there thinking I'd be interested in them, but on the list they remain for months, waiting for me to click on them.
The transactional costs for me to queue a movie on Instant Netflix are pretty low - I browse movies on my computer and click to add them to my queue. If I never watch them, I'm not out a whole lot - 15 to 30 seconds of time. Pirating a movie from a torrent site doesn't impose a heavy transactional cost, either. With fast downloads, a DVD pirate can grab lots of movies that he/she may be interested or may watch some day in a short amount of time(I think). Were stealing more difficult, I would venture to guess that the pirate would go after only the movies he really wants to watch, i.e., those that he would probably be willing to spend money on. But, downloading ain't hard, so he goes willy-nilly picking every independent flick and documentary out there. Those aren't true lost sales, because the pirate never would have bought them in the first place.
Well, that's all just a rambling conjecture posing one possible explanation. That said, I have heard very small filmmakers (sub $1 million budgets) talk about the very real effect that downloading has on them and their crew.
There is a gap in the industry, there is a demand for smaller files to store on hard drives that the movie makers are not filling. They are blaming poor sales on downloading, but fail to see that poor sales come from poor films. Good films still make money at the box office and in DVD sales.